Legal Opinion

Rebel v. Rebel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2013No. 20130032, 20130033PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jesse Rebel and Brandi Rebel (“Rebels”) appeal from district court orders granting Wendy Rebel two-year disorderly conduct restraining orders against them. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the disorderly conduct restraining orders against the Rebels under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-31.2-01.

I

[¶ 2] Wendy Rebel and Jesse Rebel were divorced in 2009 and have two minor children. In 2011, Jesse Rebel married Brandi Rebel.

[¶ 3] On April 26, 2012, Wendy Rebel petitioned the district court for disorderly conduct restraining orders against…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Meier v. MeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Estate of HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Hoffarth v. HoffarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Keller v. KellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Jones v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API