Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Nasca
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 16, 1990No. 71157PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ADAMS, Presiding Judge:
Appellant Lucy Johnson contends the trial court erred in granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment in her action alleging breach of contract, tortious breach of contract, and tortious interference with employment and contractual relations. It is undisputed Johnson was summarily terminated as a Program Director on June 30, 1987, without prior notice of any deficiency in her job performance.
Johnson contends she should not have been terminated until the “problem solving” and “corrective action” procedures described in an employee handbook were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Hinson v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Langdon v. Saga Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Mac Adjustment, Inc. v. Property Loss Research BureauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Shelby v. Zayre Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Richmond v. Oneok, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States Ex Rel. Yesudian v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Swanson v. Liquid Air CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Arthur L. Black v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc., a Division of Baker Hughes, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.