Legal Opinion

Hamada v. Westcott

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 2003No. 23124, 23125PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

In the absence of an express authorization by statute, as is the case here, we hold that attorneys’ fees and costs may not be awarded in an arbitration proceeding unless the governing arbitration agreement provides for such an award. The underlying arbitration agreement lacked any provision authorizing an award of attorneys’ fees and costs to the prevailing party. Accordingly, the January 4, 2000 order of the first circuit court (the court) 1 which confirmed an arbitrator’s award of attorneys’ fees and costs must be reversed.

I

On July 31, 1996,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mathewson v. Aloha Airlines, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Labrador v. Liberty Mutual GroupHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  2. County of Hawaii v. UNIDEV, LLC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Kona Village Realty, Inc. v. Sunstone Realty Partners, XIV, LLCHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. In re Arbitration between Hawaii State Teachers Association and State of Hawaii, Department of Education. ICA Opinion, filed 11/26/2013. Consolidated with No. CAAP-11-0000140.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  5. In re the Grievance Arbitration Between State of Hawaii Organization of Police Officers & County of Kaua'iHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API