Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re the Grievance Arbitration Between State of Hawaii Organization of Police Officers & County of Kaua'i

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 2014No. CAAP-10-0000077Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and dissenting opinion by

GINOZA, J.

In this appeal, we consider whether the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit (circuit court) was correct in vacating the remedy portion of the Arbitration Decision and Award (Arbitration Decision), in which Employers-Appellees County of Kaua'i and the Kaua'i Police Department (collectively the County) were ordered to promote three non-seleeted candidates (the Grievants) to the position of Sergeant in the Kaua‘i Police Department and which awarded attendant back pay and benefits.

I concur with the majority that the County was not estopped from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Tatibouet v. EllsworthHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re the Arbitration Between Clawson & Habilitat, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. University of Hawaii Professional Assembly v. University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Brennan v. Stewarts' Pharmacies, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API