In re Arbitration between Hawaii State Teachers Association and State of Hawaii, Department of Education. ICA Opinion, filed 11/26/2013. Consolidated with No. CAAP-11-0000140.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
NAKAYAMA, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
At issue is whether the doctrine of sovereign immunity protects the State from an arbitrator’s award of prejudgment interest. We hold that, under the facts of this ease, it does not. Because judicial review of an arbitration award is confined to the strictest possible limits, and because the arbitrator in this case reasonably interpreted the arbitration agreement in fashioning the award, we hold that the arbitrator did not exceed his authority in awarding prejudgment interest against the State. We also hold that the award of attorneys’ fees…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Bush v. WatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Chun v. Board of TrusteesHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
- Sierra Club v. Department of Transportation of the StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- RTI Connectivity Pte. Ltd. v. Gateway Network Connections, LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
- RTI Connectivity Pte. Ltd. v. Gateway Network Connections, LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2023
- RTI Connectivity Pte. Ltd. v. Gateway Network Connections, LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2023