Legal Opinion

Smith, Waters, Kuehn, Burnett & Hughes, Ltd. v. Burnett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 20, 1989No. 3-89-0380PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

Defendant, Robert Burnett (Burnett), appeals from an order of the circuit court of Peoria County granting a preliminary injunction to plaintiffs, Lester Berry Smith (Smith) and Smith, Waters, Kuehn, Burnett & Hughes, Ltd. (SWKB & H). The order restrained Burnett, an attorney, from soliciting clients for workers’ compensation and personal injury cases in most Illinois counties. Burnett argues that the order should be reversed, because: (1) plaintiffs failed to establish the requisites for injunctive relief; (2) the compensation provision in his employment agreement with SWKB & H was vague and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Houston Oilers, Inc. v. Ralph NeelyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. Armour & Co. v. United American Food Processors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Shorr Paper Products, Inc. v. FraryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams & Montgomery, Ltd. v. StellatoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Stevens v. Rooks Pitts and PoustAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Tomei v. TomeiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Diepholz v. RutledgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API