Legal Opinion

Williams & Montgomery, Ltd. v. Stellato

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 13, 1990No. 1-89-2069PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE DiVITO

delivered the opinion of the court:

Petitioner-appellant Williams & Montgomery, Ltd. (Williams & Montgomery), a Chicago-based law'firm, filed suit against Donald E. Stellato and Richard W. Schumacher, two former nonequity partners of the firm, seeking to enjoin them from soliciting clients of the firm pursuant to written noncompetition agreements. Williams & Montgomery petitioned for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction. Following a hearing, the petition was denied. Williams & Montgomery now appeals pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 307 (a)(1) (107…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. SpeakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Canfield v. SpearIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Cockerill v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Image Supplies, Inc. v. HilmertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Hydroaire, Inc. v. SagerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lawrence & Allen, Inc. v. Cambridge Human Resource Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. Springfield Rare Coin Galleries, Inc. v. MilehamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Northwest Diversified, Inc. v. DesaiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Lawrence & Allen, Inc. v. Cambridge Human Res. Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Matter of CupplesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API