Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. Lajoie

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1902No. Appeal, No. 326PublishedCited by 89 opinions

Appeal, No. 326, Jan. T., 1902, by-plaintiff:, from decree of C. P. No. 5, Phila. Co., dismissing bill in equity in case of Philadelphia Ball Club, Limited, v. Napoleon Lajoie et al. Bill in equity for an injunction.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 326, Jan. T., 1902, by-plaintiff:, from decree of C. P. No. 5, Phila. Co., dismissing bill in equity in case of Philadelphia Ball Club, Limited, v. Napoleon Lajoie et al. Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Ralston, J. From the record it appeared that the defendant was employed by the plaintiff as a baseball player under a contract dated April 18, 1900, the materal portions of which were as follows: 5. It is mutually agreed between the parties thereto, that if the said party of the second part shall, at any time during the said term of his employment as aforesaid, without the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

The defendant in this case contracted to serve the plaintiff as a baseball player for a stipulated time. During that period he was not to play for any other club. He violated his agreement, however, during the term of his engagement, and in disregard of his contract, arranged to play for another and a rival organization.

The plaintiff by means of this bill, sought to restrain him, during the period covered by the contract.

The court below refused an injunction, holding that to warrant the interference prayed for, “ The defendant’s services must be unique,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Franklin Telegraph Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Rust v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Grove v. HodgesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  5. Commonwealth v. Pittsburgh & Connellsville RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. A.L.K. Corporation v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  2. Mission Independent School District v. DiserensTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Alabama Binder & Chemical Corp. v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Madison Square Garden Corporation v. BraddockCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
  5. Driebe v. Fort Penn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API