Diepholz v. Rutledge
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE COOK
delivered the opinion of the court:
This case presents the question whether an automobile dealer who has covenanted not to engage in the automobile business in a certain county may, nevertheless, solicit customers or advertise within that county.
In 1991, plaintiff Kenneth Diepholz purchased an automobile dealership located in Mattoon, Coles County, Illinois, from defendant George W. Rutledge. As part of the sales transaction, the parties signed a covenant not to complete, which provided in pertinent part:
"GEORGE W. RUTLEDGE, in exchange for the sum of $384,000.00 dollars…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Russell v. Jim Russell Supply, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Jackson v. HammerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Hagerty, Lockenvitz, Ginzkey & Associates v. GinzkeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- A-Tech Computer Services, Inc. v. Soo HooAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Smith, Waters, Kuehn, Burnett & Hughes, Ltd. v. BurnettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Interim Health Care of Northern Illinois, Inc. v. Interim Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Lempa v. FinkelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Sheehy v. SheehyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Emergency Medical Care, Inc., Doing Business as Trauma Systems, Inc. v. Marion Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Interim Health IL v. Interim Health CareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.