Legal Opinion

Sullivan, Bodney & Hammond, PC v. Bodney

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 22, 1991No. 64,377PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conklin, J.:

Robert Sullivan, Howard Bodney, and Charles Hammond incorporated Sullivan, Bodney and Hammond, P.C. (SBH), under the laws of the State of Missouri on May 1, 1980. By May 1985, the office was in a state of discord. Sullivan notified Hammond and Bodney that he wished to terminate SBH. On June 8, 1985, in a “hostile” meeting, the three principals met to discuss winding up SBH. At this meeting, the three principals fixed July 31, 1985, as the date they would cease the practice of law as SBH. The matter of cases and contingent fees was discussed; however, a formal agreement was not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meehan v. SHAUGHNESSY COHENMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Hutchinson National Bank & Trust Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  3. Newton v. Hornblower, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Jewel v. BoxerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. Johnson-HowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. Huber v. EtkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Labrum & Doak v. Ashdale (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Schrempp and Salerno v. GrossNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Labrum & Doak v. Brown (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API