Legal Opinion
Schrempp and Salerno v. Gross
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1995No. S-93-446PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.
In this case, the trial court ordered that a fee for legal services (Kopp fee) should be divided pursuant to the formula contained in a partnership agreement of three attorneys, Warren Schrempp, Joseph F. Gross, Jr., and Terrence Salerno.
The court also ordered that one-half of a second fee for legal services (Jones fee) should be distributed by the same formula to the former partners of Schrempp, Gross & Salerno and that the other one-half should be paid to the law firm of Byam & Byam.
The court also held that the Schrempp, Gross & Salerno partnership was dissolved when Gross left it and took…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jewel v. BoxerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Resnick v. KaplanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Bowman v. City of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Frates v. NicholsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Strunk v. Chromy-StrunkNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Medlock v. MedlockNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Metro Renovation, Inc. v. State Department of LaborNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Fraternal Order of Police v. County of DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Loan Modification Group, Inc. v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.