Huber v. Etkin

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.:

Robert A. Huber [“Appellant”] appeals from a November 8, 2010 order.1 That order granted Michael A. Etkin [“Appel-lee”]^ post-trial motion and ordered a new trial. After careful review, we affirm.

The trial court concisely summarized the facts as follows:

[Appellant] and [Appellee] are former law partners in two partnerships: Etkin & Huber, LLP (“E & H”) and Yankow-itz, Etkin and Huber, LLP (‘TEH”).

E & H was formed in 2002 by [Appellant] and [Appellee]. There was no written partnership agreement govern*774ing E & H. Pursuant to the oral partnership agreement profits were divided…