Legal Opinion
Meehan v. SHAUGHNESSY COHEN
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 28, 1989PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.
The plaintiffs, James F. Meehan (Meehan) and Leo V. Boyle (Boyle), were partners of the law firm, Parker, Coulter, Daley & White (Parker Coulter). After Meehan and Boyle terminated their relationship with Parker Coulter to start their own firm, they commenced this action both to recover amounts they claim the defendants, their former partners, owed them under the partnership agreement, and to obtain a declaration as to amounts they owed the defendants for work done at Parker Coulter on cases they removed to their new firm. The defendants (hereinafter collectively Parker Coulter) 4…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- New England Canteen Service, Inc. v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Fishman v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Cardullo v. LandauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Starr v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.