Legal Opinion

Walker v. . Walker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 22, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Upon the trial of an issue of fact by the court its decision shall be given in writing and shall contain a separate statement of the facts found and the conclusions of law. C. S., 569; Eley v. R. R., 165 N. C., 78. Conceding for the present purpose that the principle applies when mixed questions of fact and law are involved (Foushee v. Pattershall, 67 N. C., 453) we think there is no substantial difference between the parties as to the facts upon which the controversy is to be determined.

The plaintiff did not appeal. The sums assessed against him are a debt of record and may be enforced by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Pain v. . PainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Burke v. . TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Sanders Ex Rel. Pratt v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schlaefer v. SchlaeferCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Barber v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Wright v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Coffey v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Howell v. . HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API