Heussner v. National Gypsum Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs, former employees of the National Gypsum Company, appeal the dis*674trict court’s dismissal of their action on a collective bargaining agreement for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because the plaintiffs failed to specify in their notice of appeal the party or parties taking the appeal, we grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss all of the parties to this appeal except the named plaintiff, Farrell J. Heussner. As to Heussner’s claims, we affirm the district court’s decision to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
I
The plaintiffs,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rozay's Transfer v. Local Freight Drivers, Local 208, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Serrano v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Daniel v. HagelDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Carl Bauer, Craig M. Bennett v. Rbx Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Williams v. Wci Steel Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Williams v. WCI Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Rudd v. Baker FurnitureDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.