Legal Opinion

Entila v. Cook

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2017No. 92581-0PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

¶1 This case involves the scope of the immunity provisions of the Industrial Insurance Act (IIA), Title 51 RCW, as applied to a third party tort action against another employee when the accident occurred after working hours, but where the injured plaintiff qualified for benefits under the act. The trial court dismissed the suit on summary judgment, holding the act applied to bar suit. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that immunity did not apply because the alleged coemployee tortfeasor was not acting in the scope and course of employment. Entila v. Cook, 190 Wn. App. 477, 486, 360 P.3d…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Flanigan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. AzpitarteWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. AzpitarteWashington Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. Jefferson County Pub. Transp. Benefit AreaWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Gilmore v. Jefferson County Pub. Transp. Benefit AreaWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Morris Byrd v. Hansen Beverage Company d/b/a Monster Beverage Corporation; Monster Energy Company; Monster Energy International Company; Monster Energy US, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API