Legal Opinion

State v. Azpitarte

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2000No. 68418-9PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

995 P.2d 31 (2000)

140 Wash.2d 138

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Richard AZPITARTE, Petitioner.

No. 68418-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, Department 2.

Considered February 8, 2000.

Decided March 9, 2000.

Nielsen, Broman & Assoc., Christopher Gibson, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, Lisa N. O'Toole, Dennis McCurdy, Deputies, Seattle, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

Richard Azpitarte seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming his conviction for felony violation of a no-contact order. He contends that a second degree assault cannot serve as the predicate assault to enhance…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Washington State Coalition for the Homeless v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. AzpitarteWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by73 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. DeSantiagoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2001

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API