In re Gould
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶ 1. Petitioner, Michael Gould, appeals the Chittenden Superior Court’s denial of his post-conviction relief motion. Gould claims that the court violated his statutory right to counsel under 13 V.S.A. §§ 5231, 5233, when it failed to assign new counsel after permitting the previous post-conviction relief counsel to withdraw. In light of the right to counsel afforded by our Public Defender Act, the court erred in refusing to appoint new counsel to assist Gould on his first post-conviction relief petition. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
¶ 2. Petitioner Michael Gould was arraigned in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- State v. RueSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Zedekiah Suggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- In Re BarrowsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- In re CrannellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- In re Bruyette.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In re BarrowsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.