Legal Opinion

Wassilie v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided August 1, 2014No. A-11654PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

OPINION

Norman Wassilie litigated a petition for post-conviction relief in the superior court. He was initially represented by an attorney from the Public Defender Agency. But after the assistant public defender investigated Wassilie's case, he filed a certificate of "no arguable merit" under Alaska Criminal Rule 35.1(e)(2). In other words, Wassilie's attorney told the superior court that, after investigating Wassilie's potential claims for post-conviction relief, the attorney concluded that Wassilie had no colorable claims to raise, and that the court should dismiss…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Grinols v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2001
  5. Tazruk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marlon Mack v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023
  2. State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
  3. State of Alaska v. Jason Lee CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
  4. State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API