Wassilie v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
OPINION
Norman Wassilie litigated a petition for post-conviction relief in the superior court. He was initially represented by an attorney from the Public Defender Agency. But after the assistant public defender investigated Wassilie's case, he filed a certificate of "no arguable merit" under Alaska Criminal Rule 35.1(e)(2). In other words, Wassilie's attorney told the superior court that, after investigating Wassilie's potential claims for post-conviction relief, the attorney concluded that Wassilie had no colorable claims to raise, and that the court should dismiss…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Grinols v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2001
- Tazruk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marlon Mack v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
- State of Alaska v. Jason Lee CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019