Legal Opinion

Fouche v. Royal Indemnity Co. of New York

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 13, 1950No. 16369PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fishburne, Justice.

The plaintiffs, who are sisters seek to recover the sum of $14,786.47, with interest, upon a surety bond executed by the Royal Indemnity Company of New York on September 18, 1925. The bond, in the sum of $125,000.00, was given to qualify Parnell Whaley, mother of the plaintiffs, as admin-istratrix of the estate of V. T. Whaley, their father, in the Probate Court of Orangeburg County.

Plaintiffs allege that their mother, the administratrix, in her final accounting, wrongfully took credit for two items totaling the amount sued for, comprising, (1) Commissions in the sum of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bagwell v. HintonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  2. Clark v. NevesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Rice v. BambergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  4. Hendrix v. HoldenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  5. Scott v. NewellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina, Also Known as the Catawba Nation of South Carolina v. State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  2. SINGLETON v. Mullins Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  3. Yarbrough v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Erwin v. PATTERSONSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  5. Coleman v. DanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API