Legal Opinion

Erwin v. PATTERSON

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 12, 1956No. 17145PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

I. D. Knox died on June 15, 1928 and his son, David S. Knox, who was a minor seventeen years of age, became entitled to receive the sum of $833.34 from an insurance policy on the life of his father. It became necessary becaúse of the minority of David S. Knox that some suitable person be appointed his guardian. Pursuant to due application by the said minor, E. A. Patterson was, on June 22, 1928, by the Probate Court of Abbeville County, appointed his guardian. In order to qualify as guardian E. A. Patterson executed a bond in the sum of $3,000.00, conditioned for the faithful…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  2. Bagwell v. HintonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  3. Bishop v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Clark v. NevesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Rice v. BambergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. JoyceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. Meyerson v. MalinowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Scurry v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  4. Schreiberg v. Southern Coatings & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  5. Bank for Savings and Trusts v. ToweSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API