Legal Opinion
Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina, Also Known as the Catawba Nation of South Carolina v. State of South Carolina
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1989No. 82-1671PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge:
The Supreme Court remanded this case for us to determine whether the claim of the Catawba Indian Tribe to a tract of land is barred by South Carolina statutes of limitations. South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc., 476 U.S. 498, 106 S.Ct. 2039, 90 L.Ed.2d 490 (1986). We hold that the statutes of limitations pertaining to disabled persons, sections 15-3-370 and 15-3-40 of the Code of South Carolina, do not bar the tribe from maintaining this action. We also hold that sections 15-3-340 and 15-67-210 bar the tribe from recovering possession and damages from a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Taylor v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. State of S.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Pit River Home & Agricultural Cooperative Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Pit River Home and Agricultural Cooperative Association v. United States of America, Pit River Tribal Council, Cross-Claimant-Counterclaim-Defendants-Appellees v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior, United States of America, Cross-Claim-Defendants-Counterclaim v. Pit River Home and Agricultural Cooperative Association Erin Forrest, Cross-Claim-Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants v. Pit River Home and Agricultural Cooperative Association, Cross-Claim-Defendants-Appellants. Pit River Tribal Council, Cross-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. Pit River Home and Agricultural Cooperative Association Erin Forrest, Cross-Claim-Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.