Legal Opinion
Taliaferro v. Taliaferro
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 1956No. Civ. 16737PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
The plaintiff, E. A. Taliaferro, brought an action against his ex-wife and her attorney for a “manda tory injunction and accrued damages.” The defendants demurred, generally. The demurrer was sustained without leave to amend. Judgment was entered in favor of defendants. Plaintiff, in propria persona, appeals.
The complaint alleges that on July 26, 1954, defendant Dorothy Taliaferro secured a judgment against plaintiff in Contra Costa County; that as a result of that judgment defendants are claiming a lien against all of plaintiff’s property in Contra Costa County; that since July 26, 1954, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wuest v. WuestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Ferrea v. TubbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Schwartz v. California Claim Service, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Bodem v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Eppinger v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ramona Manor Convalescent Hospital v. Care EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Roman v. RiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968