Legal Opinion
Universal Gym Equipment, Inc v. Vic Tanny International, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 7, 1994No. Docket 157313PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMichael J. Kelly, P.J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right a circuit court order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7) and (8) and dismissing plaintiffs complaint for contribution and indemnification following settlement of an underlying suit against plaintiff by a third party. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
i
On March 13, 1990, Catherine Ostroski filed suit against plaintiff Universal Gym Equipment, Inc., after she was injured at a Vic Tanny health club while using an exercise machine manufactured by Universal. Ostroski alleged that Universal was at fault. Because of a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Caldwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Moyses v. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lamp v. ReynoldsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Department of Transportation v. ChristensenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Poly-Flex Construction, Inc. v. Neyer, Tiseo & Hindo, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- Dresser v. Cradle of Hope Adoption Center, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Universal Gym Equipment, Inc. v. Vic Tanny International, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.