Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1997No. 96CA1799PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CASEBOLT.

This is a declaratory judgment proceeding involving an interpretation of the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (Nofault Act), § 10-4-701, et seq., C.R.S.1997. Plaintiff, Richard Martinez, appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, which declared that he owned the motorcycle he was riding when injured during an accident and that, thus, he was not entitled to personal injury protection (PIP) benefits as a resident relative using a non-owned vehicle under his parent’s automobile insurance policy. We affirm.

The facts are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federico v. Universal CIT Credit CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. McCall v. RoperColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Sifuentes v. WeedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Potter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Hill v. Koching (In Re Garberding)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2005
  3. Brucha v. Cruise America, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Lamb v. GEICO General Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API