Legal Opinion

Federico v. Universal CIT Credit Corporation

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 10, 1959No. 18288PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

Defendant in error, as plaintiff in the trial court, instituted a replevin action alleging its right to the immediate possession of a certain Ford automobile. Trial to the court resulted in judgment in its favor. Plaintiff’s alleged ownership derives from a chattel mortgage given in Ft. Worth, Texas, by one Thomas Parks, the mortgagor of the vehicle here involved, to secure a loan in the amount of $2506.20.

In conformity with the laws of Texas, plaintiff’s mortgage had been duly filed and the lien had been noted on the face of the Texas Certificate of Title. This Certificate had been retained…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bank of Atlanta v. FretzTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Mosko v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  3. First Nat. Bank of Ogallala, Neb. v. Chuck Lowen, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Fleming v. GevelhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. GallOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bernstein v. Sommer (In Re Sommer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  3. Doenges-Glass, Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  4. Colorado Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. CAT Continental, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1986
  5. Northern Insurance Co. of New York v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API