Lamb v. GEICO General Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge VOGT.
Defendant, GEICO General Insurance Company, appeals the trial court judgment declaring that plaintiff, June Lamb, was entitled to personal injury protection (PIP) coverage under her automobile insurance policy issued by defendant. We reverse and remand with directions.
Plaintiff was injured when the motoreycle she was driving collided with a car. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was the named insured under two insurance policies issued by defendant. The first, a motoreycle insurance policy, provided liability and property damage coverage, but not PIP coverage. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- DeHerrera Ex Rel. DeHerrera v. Sentry Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- United Airlines, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Fazio v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Thompson v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New Hampshire Insurance Company v. TSG Ski & GolfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
- Boulder Country Club v. Boulder County Board of CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2003