Legal Opinion
Potter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 3, 2000No. 99CA0146PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge NEY.
In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiff, Carol Potter, appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of her insurer, defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). We reverse ,and remand with directions to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff.
Plaintiff was a passenger in an uninsured car, driven by her son, when she was injured in a collision. The other driver was at fault, but was also uninsured.
Plaintiff filed a claim with State Farm for uninsured motorist benefits under her own policy. This policy excluded coverage:(2) for bodily injury to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Carlson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. McMillanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Bohrer v. Church Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. v. BoatrightColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- GEICO Casualty Co. v. CollinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hill v. Koching (In Re Garberding)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2005
- American Standard Insurance v. SavaianoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2003
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. Pring-WilsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- American Economy Insurance Company v. Scott Sepic, Page Sepic, and Vesta Denver, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.