Legal Opinion

Jacobsen v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

There are three assignments of error: (1) That the court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict because there existed a reasonable doubt as a matter of law of the defendant’s guilt. (2) That the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial because the verdict was against the preponderance of the evidence. (3) That the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. ■

*306(1st) Upon the trial the defendant attempted to establish the fact that the complaining witness, Renata Zastrow, had intercourse with other men at a time when it made it impossible for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hedger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Busse v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Walata v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ferry v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Teasdale v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Dascenzo v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Euclide v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Hayes v. RoffersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API