Legal Opinion · Dissent

Association of Cleveland Fire Fighters, Local 93 v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 2004No. 82111Published

1DissentJames J. Sweeney, Judge

{¶ 21} I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion which reverses and dismisses this matter. I disagree with the majority’s interpretation of the complaint as stating a cause of action within the exclusive jurisdiction of SERB and the majority’s determination to dismiss the taxpayer’s action on its finding that the plaintiffs failed to sufficiently establish a “public benefit,” although the jury found otherwise.

{¶ 22} The Ohio Supreme Court has delineated only two distinct areas in which SERB possesses exclusive jurisdiction, the first being “where one of the parties files charges with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Caspar v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. White v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State ex rel. Citizens for a Better Portsmouth v. SydnorOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. City of Cincinnati Ex Rel. Simons v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. City of Cleveland Ex Rel. O'Malley v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API