Parks-Cramer Co. v. Mathews Cotton Mills
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYCHE, District Judge.
This action was instituted by the plaintiff to recover the alleged balance due by the defendant upon certain heating, humidifying and air conditioning equipment installed in the defendant’s mill. The complaint alleges that this equipment was sold and delivered under three written contracts entered into between the parties.
The answer admits the execution of the three contracts, alleges that the plaintiff failed to perform said contracts, and denies that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in any sum whatever. The answer further proceeds to set up two counterclaims,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scudder v. Union National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Gaston, Williams & Wigmore of Canada, Ltd. v. WarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Schenley Distillers Corporation v. RenkenDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1940
- Food Co. v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- American Pure Food Co. v. G. W. Elliott & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rossy v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
- Riss & Co. v. Association of Western RailwaysDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958
- Voltube Corp. v. B. & C. INSULATION PRODUCTSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Contogeorge v. SpyrouDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Israel v. AlexanderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.