Legal Opinion
Israel v. Alexander
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 28, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEI BELL, District Judge.
Defendant has moved under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for an order (1) striking out the plaintiff’s complaint, with leave to serve an amended complaint, or, in the alternative, (2) striking out portions of the complaint as redundant, immaterial, impertinent or scandalous.
Facts
The complaint contains the following allegations :
On July 25, 1941, in the State of Illinois, the plaintiff, Arthur L. Israel, entered into an agreement with the defendant, Samuel S. Alexander, a copy of which is annexed to the complaint.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Callner v. GreenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
- Waldman Produce, Inc. v. Frigidaire Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935
- Parks-Cramer Co. v. Mathews Cotton MillsDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Berry v. Druid City Hospital BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Boulevard Airport, Inc. v. Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- National Cold Storage Co. v. Port of New York AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- De Leys v. Keta Gas & Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955