Legal Opinion

Food Co. v. . Elliott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 8, 1909PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action commenced before a justice of the peace and tried upon appeal.

These issues were submitted, without objection:

1. Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, as allege in the complaint, and, if so, in what amount? Answer: No.

2. Did the plaintiff's agent, at the time of the sale, falsely represent and warrant the powders to be the same kind and quality as the Royal baking powder? Answer: Yes.

3. Did the said agent, at the time, know the representations as to kind and quality of the goods to be false, and were they made with intent to deceive defendant? Answer: Yes.

4. Did the defendant rely…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nash v. Minnesota Title Insurance & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  2. Kimball v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  3. Johnson v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Warren v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Lenox v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. ZykanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. General Electric Co. v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Thrams v. BlockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Henderson v. MunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  5. Rankin v. HelmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API