Legal Opinion

Brenda Dickenson v. Michael Petit

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 1, 1982No. 82-1315PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREYER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs represent a limited' class of Maine recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”). See 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 601-676 (West 1974 & Supp. 1975-1981). Maine, in calculating the size of their grants, no longer gave them the advantage of an “Earned Income Disregard” (“EID”) after February 1, 1982. Plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief from the federal district court requiring Maine to use the EID for several additional months. The court refused to grant a preliminary injunction, and plaintiffs appealed. To prevail here they must show that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Barnes v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Michele Levesque v. John R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture, Michele Levesque v. John R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture, Richard A. ChevrefilsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  3. Turner v. ProdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Brown v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. Donna Sweeney v. Joseph J. Murray, Margaret Heckler, Etc., Donna Sweeney v. Joseph J. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API