Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re: Ricardo Pinder, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 1, 2016No. 16-12084-JPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

Ricardo Pinder, Jr., seeks authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He can file such a motion only if the motion is “certified ... by a panel of the appropriate court of appeals to contain” either:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Keith Lamont Jordan v. Secretary, DOCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  5. James Dimaya v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In re: Marckson Saint FleurCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  2. In re ColonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  3. In re: Gary BaptisteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  4. In Re: James Howard SamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  5. In Re: Emilio GomezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API