Legal Opinion
In Re: James Howard Sams
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 26, 2016No. 16-14515-JPublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE PANEL:
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), James Howard Sams has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if we certify that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evi- . dence that no reasonable factfinder would have found…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Deandre ArmourCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Jamaal EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Jerome WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Irma Ovalles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.