Legal Opinion
James Dimaya v. Loretta E. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 19, 2015No. 11-71307PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner James Garcia Dimaya seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) determination that a conviction for burglary under California Penal Code Section 459 is categorically a “crime of violence” as defined by 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F), a determination which rendered petitioner removable for having been convicted of an aggravated felony. During the pendency of petitioner’s appeal, the United States Supreme Court decided Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- United States v. Joseph SimmsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Hechavarria v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Aaron GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Gregorio Gonzalez-LongoriaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.