In re: Marckson Saint Fleur
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE PANEL:
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Marckson Saint Fleur has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district, court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Keith Lamont Jordan v. Secretary, DOCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- In Re: Ricardo Pinder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
3Cited by113 opinions
- United States v. Daniel MathisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. GoochCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- In re ColonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Irma Ovalles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.