Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Boggess

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 5, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Mnhlenbnrg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clarke —

Affirming.

The appellants, who were plaintiffs below, claiming to he the owners, and in possession, of two small adjoining tracts of land, about nineteen acres in all, filed this action to recover of appellee, F. Y. Boggess, damages in the sum of $600.00 for alleged trespasses, including the accidental destruction by fire of the dwelling house thereon, it being alleged in the petition, however, that Alma Boggess, the wife of F. Y. Boggess, had a dower interest in the land and she was made a defendant because she declined to join as plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Henderson v. AshbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Boggess v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whitmer v. CardwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. HornungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Board of Drainage Commissioners v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Harmon v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Wages' Administrator v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API