Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 24, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

By this action the appellant, who was the plaintiff below, sought to recover damages for fright unaccompanied by physical impact. A demurrer to her petition was overruled. The defendant then traversed the allegations of that pleading, and on the issues thus formed, the parties went to trial. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, the court peremptorily instructed the jury to find for the defendant, and from the judgment entered on that verdict, this appeal is prosecuted.

We find in the record that over appellee’s objection the appellant filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Witt v. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Western Assurance Co. v. RectorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  3. Johnson v. BoggessCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Traut v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moran's v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Perkins-Bowling Coal Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Woolery v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API