Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 23, 1972No. Civ. 39901PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHWEITZER, J.
We issued an alternative writ of mandate to review the trial court’s order of February 8, 1972 in Thompson, et al. vs. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court case No. 942305, granting the motion for change of venue filed by The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, real party in interest. Santa Fe has filed a demurrer and answer to the petition for writ of mandate. The demurrer is based on the ground that the petition fails to set forth facts sufficient to indicate that the trial court abused its discretion in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Willingham v. PecoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- McNeill & Co. v. DoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Harden v. Skinner & HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morris v. AGFA CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Benthin v. Emeritus Corp. CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Rycz v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022