Legal Opinion
McNeill & Co. v. Doe
California Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1912No. S.F. No. 5782PublishedCited by 19 opinions
The facts’ are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This appeal is from an order denying the motion of defendant Reick (sued as John Doe) for a change of the place of trial of the action and from the judgment entered against him.
The suit was in claim and delivery to recover from defendant Reick possession of a piano alleged to have been delivered to him by the defendant Hirsch, a piano salesman for plaintiff in exchange for a secondhand automobile, without authority so to do.
The action was commenced in the superior court of Fresno County and summons served on defendant Reick in Tulare County on May 17, 1910. On June 9, 1910, defendant Reick…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Scott v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. Spring Valley Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Lundy v. LettunichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Henry v. WillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.