Legal Opinion

Rider v. City of Norman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 1970No. 42468PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice.

This action was commenced to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when she fell over a defect in one of the sidewalks of the defendant City of Norman. The defect consisted of a rise of two (2) inches in two sections of the sidewalk at the point where the plaintiff tripped. The defendant submitted certain interrogatories to plaintiff along with a photograph of the scene (defendant’s Exhibit 1). The plaintiff identified the photo as correctly depicting the scene. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the question here is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. FryeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. City of Ada v. BurrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Smith v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Oklahoma City v. BanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Hale v. City of CushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Warner v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Byford v. Town of AsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. McCathern v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. Evans v. City of EufaulaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Byford v. Town of AsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API