Legal Opinion

McCathern v. City of Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 2004No. 98,735PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, V.C.J.

¶ 1 This certiorari presses two questions for our decision: (1) Did the terms of 51 O.S. Supp.1984 § 155(13), the Governmental Tort Claims Act (GTCA), which is urged to have enlarged the range of government’s immunity from liability for negligent inspections, also alter the common-law principles of liability that bind the government? and (2) Did the trial judge err by giving summary judgment to the city? We answer the first question in the negative and the second in the affirmative.

I

ANATOMY OF THE LITIGATION

¶2 Deborah McCathern (McCathern or appellant) alleges injuries sustained…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. I. T. K. v. MOUNDS PUBLIC SCHOOLSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  4. Manokoune v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. MARIANI v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API