Legal Opinion

Summit Contractors v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 28, 1988No. 180-85CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

This contract action is before the court on “Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment.” The motion asserts that plaintiffs claim is barred by the statute of limitations pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 609(a)(3) (1982), of the Contract Disputes Act, which provides for a 12 month period in which to appeal to the Claims Court from a final decision of the contracting officer. Plaintiff avers that the action is timely because the statute of limitations did not begin to run until receipt of the contracting officer’s decision upon reconsideration. For…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Bookman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  3. Bonen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Eurell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  5. Dayley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Guardian Angels Medical Service Dogs, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Summit Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  3. Arono, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  4. Robin Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Information Systems & Networks Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API