Legal Opinion

Information Systems & Networks Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 19, 1989No. 412-88CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

This action arises out of a contract with the Department of Agriculture to install and maintain a local communications network. Plaintiff submitted a claim to the contracting officer for an equitable adjustment of the contract which was denied; Plaintiff appealed this decision to the Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals which found the appeal to be untimely. Subsequently plaintiff filed a complaint in this court pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1982). Defendant has moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant to RUSCC 12(b)(1),…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Indium Corporation of America v. Semi-Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Anthony R. Hambsch, III v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Pathman Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vincent Schickler, TMD U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Bowers Investment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Bath Iron Works Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
  4. Marshall Associated Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API