Legal Opinion
Dayley v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 22, 1965No. 268-63PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam: Plaintiff’s claim is for disability retirement !y from June 4, 1953, the date of his last release from the *307Army. The petition was filed on September 19, 1963. Defendant has moved for summary judgment on the ground that the claim is barred by the six-year statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501, and also that the petition fails adequately to allege arbitrary or wrongful action by the Army in denying plaintiff disability retirement pay.
On the issue of the statute of limitations, the relevant undisputed facts appearing in the affidavits and other materials submitted on the motion…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Department of Banking of Neb. v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bookman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Biddle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- United States v. Sioux TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- William T. Miller v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.