Matter of Marriage of Clapperton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Husband appeals from a dissolution decree, contending that the trial court erred in (1) treating as marital assets businesses in which he had an interest, (2) failing to consider tax consequences in the distribution of the marital property, (3) awarding spousal support to wife, (4) failing to order wife to pay child support and (5) ordering him to pay wife’s attorney and expert witness fees. Wife cross-appeals. She contends that the trial court erred in (1) under-valuing husband’s business interests, (2) miscalculating a judgment awarded her which was intended by the court to equalize the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Marriage of Olinger and OlingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Matter of Marriage of SteinbrennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Matter of Marriage of ReilingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- In re the Marriage of WebberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- In re the Marriage of KeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.