Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Palmerton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 1982No. 80-0039-NJ-1, CA A20875PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Wife appeals a dissolution decree, contending the trial court erred in awarding her less than one-half of the marital property. We review de novo, ORS 19.125(3), and remand for further proceedings.

The parties were married in 1968. No children were born of the marriage.1 Wife, age 41, is employed as a janitor. She worked six hours daily in 1980, earned $9,000 gross pay and had net monthly income of $522. Commencing in January, 1981, she began working full time. Her expenses are about $700 monthly. She has a high school education. She desires to return to school and become a nurse.2

*108Husband, age…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. In re the Marriage of FrishkoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of ClappertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. In re the Marriage of HaynerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. In re the Marriage of SandsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. In re the Marriage of SandsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Matter of Marriage of TibblesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API