Legal Opinion

Wormouth v. Gardner

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1896No. S. F. No. 157PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Marin County. F. M. Angellotti, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Upon the former appeal in this case ( Wormouth v. Gardner, 105 Cal. 149), the plaintiff's right of recovery was based upon a homestead entry, and the receipt of the receiver of the United States land-office for the cash payment thereof. The trial of the cause below, from which that appeal was taken, was had in the year 1892, and intermediate the decision upon that trial and the decision of this court upon the appeal, a patent for the land described in the complaint was issued to the plaintiff by the United States, and upon the going down of the remittitur the defendants filed a supplemental…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Shepley v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Moore v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Lee v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Rector v. GibbonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lambert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Standard Quicksilver Co. v. HabishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cragie v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Sousa v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Wormouth v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API